Since the birth of the Xiaomi Mi 8 series, the Xiaomi Mi Digital flagship has added a new version called the “Transparent Discovery Edition”. Xiaomi Mi 8 has the Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition, Xiaomi Mi 9 and Mi 9 Explorer Edition.
In a blink of an eye, the Xiaomi Mi 9 series has been released almost a year ago, leaving Lei Jun speechless. Xiaomi Mi 9 Transparent Edition has been forgotten the Second net, and after the price cut, still, no one cares.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 Transparent Edition only has a memory version of 12 + 256GB. Recently, it was available for less than $480 offline channels. Still a few.
So the question is coming. Is the Xiaomi Mi 9 transparent version at $480 still worth starting now? I think it is good to look at two aspects, the first is the design, and the second is the hardware configuration.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 transparent version, as the name suggests, is made of a transparent glass back cover, and then the interior of the body is modified so that you can see the internal space of the phone’s body.
This design is mainly to give people a sense of technology, cool look, it looks cool. If you like this leak of technology and cool design, then Xiaomi Mi 9 Transparent Edition is a good choice.
If you look at the hardware configuration, Xiaomi Mi 9 is not worth starting, in other words, it means that the price is not high. Xiaomi Mi 9 is equipped with a Snapdragon 855 processor, with a battery capacity of only 3300mAh, and a rear Sony 48MP three-shot camera.
The configuration is really mediocre, nothing bright. At this price, isn’t it more fragrant to buy an oppo reno ace or something? RenoAce not only has Snapdragon 855plus, but the entire system is equipped with UFS3.0 as standard.
It also has a refresh rate of 90Hz, 65W super flash charge, etc. The configuration is much stronger than the Xiaomi Mi 9 transparent version.
The most important thing is that RenoAce only costs $420, and the price is still cheaper. In terms of configuration, Xiaomi Mi 9 Transparent Edition is in a situation where no one cares about it, and it is not unreasonable. What do you think?